About Me

Name: NoMoreGray
Location: Saginaw, MI
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

This is how politics are done…

 

I thought we were pretty clear in November that this was no longer an acceptable answer. When I voted in November I was making a very clear statement; show me how representation is done.

Mitch McConnell did not surprise me when he walked out of a closed door meeting with V.P. Biden and announced a tax extension compromise on behalf of the people. Honestly, I wondered why people were so ready to jump behind him as having seen the light. Yes, he made a few good speeches, but no better than I have seen in the past. I thought we were finally moving past the point where a properly worded speech could lull us into glazy grin of forgotten memories and blind following. Sadly, quicker than expected McConnell showed the hollowness of his words and got right back into politics as usual. 

What did surprise me though was seeing “cot” conservatives and some of those who I had real hope for spouting phrases from the “how politics are done” playbook. Compromise? Give to get? Where is all the pre-election rhetoric like, if we have to we will wait until January and pass a clean tax extension and make the Dems, the Rino’s and or the President put pen to paper in support of tax increases in a crippled economy. What about “the days of backroom deals are over.” Do those using these words to get elected think we will forget this promise anymore than we have forgotten “new era of transparency” or “meetings on C-span?’ If we do then we deserve what we get. I for one will not and I am already keeping score. 2012 election year conversions won’t work, I won’t be grading on a curve. If you don’t get it right now someone else will get the chance in 2012.

Here’s what is on the scorecard so far.

§        Food Safety; Grows Gov’t and Increases spending

§        Ban Earmarks

§        “Tax extension compromise” Increases spending, raises taxes (estate), has un-funded entitlements (unemployment), and unfunded subsidies

Just to be fare, one last reminder.

1.      Follow The Constitution

2.      Stop spending now

3.      Shrink government don’t grow it

4.      Reduce and repeal regulation don’t expand it

5.      Shackel or remove regulatory agencies

6.      Reform or replace IRS

7.      It’s not your money

8.      Stand firm or say goodbye, You represent us!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Recovery or Rabbit Hole?

One year ago we spent $787 billion dollars through th "American Recovery and Reinvestment Act" to "stimulate" job growth and hit the brakes on unemployment. Well there is a lot of spin out there, so here are the "no more gray" answers, simple black and white facts.

In February 2009, as reported by CNNMoney.com, the Michigan unemployment rate hit 12%.

Now February 2010 the U.S. Bureau of Labor reports that Michigan has an unemployment rate of 14.6%.

For those who are watching the numbers and would counter with "but the unemployment rate in September was 15.3%, so it is getting better" read this. Dexter Slusarski writes on Michiganpolicy.com Feb 4, 2010, "the decrease in unemployment is not being attributed to that of job growth but a shrinking labor force from October to December it's estimated that in the month of December alone the State's labor force dropped by 31,000. The BLS estimates that when counting marginally attached workers (those that have given up searching for work) and those who are working part time due to economic restraints in 2009 the State's unemployment rate is 21.5 percent for the year, these figures illustrate how serious the unemployment issues are in the state and how much higher the unemployment rate could grow"

Lastly, for the YBB's (Ya But Bush) here's the black and white, Michigan lost 173,000 jobs in 2008 for an average unemployment rate of 8.4%.

You don't need me or anyone else to tell you what to think or how to feel. Do you think you spent wisely? Would you spend 7 dollars and 87 cents for these results, much less $787 billion dollars? The big question, as congress and the President run towards another jobs bill, how much more will you spend? Finally, if this is not how you would choose to invest your money, what will you do about it?
From the voice of,
www.wethe912people.org
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Be Seen, Be Heard

 

All of us could not afford to go to DC in July and cannot afford to in September, but whether you can or not there is something you should do between now and then. While we might not be able to go to DC we should be able to afford a few trips to their local offices. In August your Congressmen and Senators are coming to you and giving you a month to make yourself known. We all seem to rally to the big events that come and go, but what do we do to let them know we have not left? What do we do to remind them where they come from and to whom they owe their job? Can we make it clear they should not fear other politicians, but the people who will speak through the voters box?

I think that a large statement can be made if the returning politicians see a continued presence at their local offices for the duration of their vacation. I think all the issues that confront us today boil down to a single point they need to be reminded of. Whether the issue is “stimulus” waste, Government takeover of “healthcare”, or “Cap and Trade”(tax) our gripe is the same, “We Pay You To Represent Us.” We need to make the simple point clear, if you fail to show up on our behalf we will not fail to show up to remove you from office. Before they return to DC in September make it clear they ignore us at their own peril!
 
September 12 cometh. For those who can make it to DC in September the effort will have a greater effect and a deep seeded meaning. The politicians will know for every one person with a sign at the Congressional steps there are many more back at home deciding who will have that DC office next year.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »